For
almost any subject in genealogical research involving online databases,
particularly commercial websites, I have lately seen many comments about how
people could not readily find their family members or the names were so screwed
up as to be meaningless. These problems were then related back to some
imaginary circumstance under which the website owners were really only
interested in making money, not in helping people, and were just there to gouge
consumers.
I,
too, have found errors in indexes and transcriptions. But, as someone who has
been involved in transcribing thousands of pages of old documents with tens of thousands
of entries, I know how difficult it can be to decipher old style handwriting,
poor penmanship, faded or torn originals and indifferent spelling – just to
start with. I wonder if those complaining have ever volunteered to transcribe anything.
If they had, I think they would be much less critical in their comments about
the indexed results in many online collections or of the companies that make
the information available to us right on our home computer.
Not
so long ago, family historians had to travel across country to visit libraries
and courthouses, write letters back and forth and/or spend countless hours in
front of microfilm machines at the local Family History Centres, poring through
hundreds pages of material, in search of just one name. When material started
to appear online, there was no indexing. People had to scroll through sometimes
hundreds of images to find their ancestors. But weren’t those pictures great to
see!
We
are very fortunate to be able to short-circuit the process now with so many
online databases for which companies, along with thousands of volunteers have
spent so much time and money accessing, copying and transcribing. Transcribers
are not always right in their interpretations, but at least the indexed lists
are a good starting point. And, if we cannot find a specific name in our initial searches, we
can still scroll through the images. As James Tanner recently pointed out in
his Genealogy’s Star post, How
many genealogy online subscriptions are enough?, subscriptions to many
databases can be quite expensive but they pale in relation to the costs of
travel to almost any repository.
Of
course, companies want to make money from their services. If they did not, they
would not be in business and we would not have access to the millions of records and images we presently have. No government anywhere has the resources
to put all of their historical information online without the help of private
foundations and/or commercial entities.
Family
researchers may not agree with all of the decisions taken by the commercial
firms about what data they choose to collect or keep, or how they arrange it on
their websites. They don’t have to. But they don’t have to put up their own
money in support of profit-less enterprises or projects either.
Just
try to build your own family tree now without the help of these businesses. You
will be like my aunt was in the 1950s, 60s and 70s – having to write hundreds
of letters and travel thousands of miles to visit dozens of centres, and maybe then
not even find what you want.
Wayne
Shepheard is a volunteer with the Online Parish Clerk program,
handling four parishes in Devon, England. He has
published a number of articles about various aspects of genealogy and is a past
Editor of Chinook, the quarterly
journal of the Alberta Family Histories Society. Wayne also provides
genealogical consulting services through his business, Family History Facilitated.